Choler Magazine
  • manifesto
  • art
  • choler radio
  • interviews
  • literature
  • music
  • forums
  • home
  • In Association
     with Amazon.com
    Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

    In Association with allwall.com
    choler artist interview



    NICOLE M. BOITOS

    A struggling student artist in Philadelphia, Penn., Ms. Boitos hit the big time when she connected with former members of the music group Swans.


    By Sean Flinn | Spring, 1999

    Nicole Boitos: Self Portrait

    Read Nicole's Biography

    View Nicole's Gallery

    Sean Flinn: What drew you to become a visual artist? When did you start working as one? What specifically drew you to printmaking? Do you work with any other mediums? Would you like to?

    Nicole Boitos: As an inquisitive child, drawing was just my way of documenting what was around me, what was in me...what I saw, regardless of the actual tangibility of these things. Transcribing visually that which I could not naturally perceive with my senses. Actually, not much has changed since I was five! Just the expansion of my vocabulary and visual language skills. I wasn't serious about any of this until around high school, when I began taking classes at the university, which is where, incidentally, I was first introduced to printmaking. Printmaking is a rather indirect process, meaning what mark you make upon the stone or the metal plate is not an end-result in itself. The stages, instead of diluting the creative process, provide you with so many opportunities to manipulate the work. As many layers of line exist as layers of intent. And here you can draw this delicate, wonderful little thing which a breath could disintegrate, but which is also etched in hard, cold metal, a material which has as much compositional integrity as does the image. I've still interest in painting in oils, but just haven't the time to make painting a priority, at the moment. That will hopefully change soon, now that I'll be out of school for a short spell...

    Many of your pictures seem to examine the relationship between man and animals both real mythological. The aspects of those relationships come across as being very negative or adversarial in your prints. Is this accurate? What do you intend to communicate with pieces like those found in your "Pastoral Series?"

    The major theme, or force in my work, as in my life, is conflict - struggle - and resolution. I use the animals as vehicles for this rather simple metaphor. Anyway, none of us are any longer affected by human suffering, no matter its magnitude. But in animal life we remain perceptive of tragedy, of pain...and with that our spirits can still identify. I don't believe by nature we are humans. Trying to be turns us cold and unfeeling, we stop communicating with instinct. Animals are everything we will not allow ourselves to be.

    Tell me more about the Dragon and St. George series. What interests you about this story, and what made you decide to portray it in a series of prints? Why did you decide to invert the outcome of the tale?

    The St. George series is perhaps my most direct exercise of the conflict/struggle concept. The story is so universal - some form exists in nearly every culture. It is innate mythology. Here the force of human Man (St. George) full of virtue and valour charges against the mighty black serpent of Instinct. Well, fool that he is, is defeated and devoured by that of his own which he cannot kill entirely. We all succeed in wounding our instinct, binding it with will and earthly determination, but this is only temporary. He was bound to lose at some point! So, here it is documented.

    What qualities must a subject possess in order to be "Boitos worthy?" That is, what motivates you to portray a particular person or scene? After you've chosen the subject, how then does the creative process unfold for you. Give us some insight into your methods of composition.

    Any subjects with which I can directly or indirectly identify I consider. And working in series allows me to work them through entirely - like a complete thought rather than a solitary word or sentence. Of course, it has seemed to me that such subjects strike me with a will of their own! Once I have become taken by something, I spend a time giving it shape - again, transcribing the intangible into visually recognizable form. Next comes perhaps the step I consider the most important - organizing the composition. What overall shape in which it will be framed, how many key figures will be involved, their placement, etc. It's vital, for me, to maintain overall balance, solidity and stability of a composition while keeping everything in motion at the same time. From there, all the detailed decision making happens during the material creation process. What line should go here, or here, or there...what needs strengthening, what needs weakening...what needs dimension, what needs space. I never try to make a print look exactly like the drawing from which it came - you only create stasis this way. No matter how well you translate that original image, it remains a copy.

    What sorts of assumptions have viewers made about your work? Have they been correct? Incorrect? Suprising? Do viewers ever infer messages or themes in your work that you find valid, but which you did not consciously imply?

    This may sound horrible, but I try not to listen to the assumptions of others - they are limited by their definition. But impressions and insights are invaluable, and perhaps an artist's greatest natural resource outside of his/her own mind. Even if I disagree completely with a person, that conversation or argument acts as a sort of catalyst for a shift in your own perspective. With the Pastoral series I saw many people, at a distance, say 'oh, how nice! Oh how pleasant! What cute little bunnies!' As distance decreased between viewer and print, I began hearing, 'Oh my god, what are they doing?' Finally, if they stuck around, they would begin to notice all the little things, all the hidden details and secrets. Then, they would smile.

    How did you meet / become involved with Jarboe and Michael Gira? What led Gira to use your work for the Body Lovers album cover [pictured above]? Are there any interesting stories behind your work on that project?

    The Swans. Well, that's a long story, but here goes a brief version: Around Christmas, 1995 I was lying in a hashish coma on the floor of a friend's apartment in Chicago. He had these huge studio speakers inverted into even larger plastic barrels which were turned towards the center of that very small room. His floor was covered with the dry leaves he collected on the street, under which he was also covered. Well, he had "Feel Good Now" on the record player, the reverb filling every possible particle of dimension. It was crazy! I thought perhaps this monstrous sound was in my head, but I could feel the floor shaking, and my doing so seemed impossible. Needless to say it made a rather indelible impression. I remember the next morning reading the record jacket and feeling such a chill run through me when I looked at Jarboe's and Michael's photos. A fateful moment to be sure...I just somehow knew these two people were going to enter into my life.

    So, all this was in my head as I flew back to Philadelphia, and I began collecting everything Swans I could find, as if to get a better understanding as to what happened that night. Then , that summer, they played at this spiteful pit of a club along the Delaware - the type of place that has Jaegermiester on tap - and I witnessed first-hand their incredible power. I spent the next few weeks writing a letter to them, introducing myself, and my vague intentions...I'm still amazed I sent it, it seemed so ridiculous at the time, but I also couldn't rationalize away how compelled I felt to make that link. A few months passed and I received the letter that started my correspondence with Jarboe. We became good friends in a rather short period of time, considering the overall number of letters exchanged. Then, after sending J a note written on the back of a Renaissance-style drawing I did of a horse's ass, Michael wrote with the proposal for what would later become the BodyLovers project.

    It was a pretty intense thing, the creation of that cover series. I was working in a large downtown farmer's market at the time, and lacking a live subject, i went to one of the hog farmers there and asked to buy a pig's head (common thing in certain dishes, like head cheese). He looked at me funny when I asked for the smallest one possible, and told me to come back the next week, and he'd have it for me. So a week later I give him my ten bucks and he hands me this box about the size of a standard TV! I undid the layers of blue plastic, convinced of a mistake, to stare down at this hideous lump of eye-less pink flesh. God, and it was heavy! Luckily it fit into my empty freezer, where it lived for about two months, while I completed several propositional drawings for Michael. Afterwards, I thought about doing something obvious with it, like attaching it to the end of a stake standing in the ground somewhere in the park across the street from my house, but I shuddered to think what the homeless would do to it ... heaven forbid, right? I think I ended up just throwing it in the garbage one day, sick of it all. I'm anxious to see what other mutilated beasts I get to work from for the rest of the series! Hopefully something I can at least eat!!

    What artists influence or have influenced you (these need not be visual artists) and how have they done so?

    I've been technically influenced mostly by Albrect Durer, Rembrandt, Audubon, da Vinci, Goya, Kollwitz ... mostly Old Masters. I'm passionate about their ability to use line - very juicy stuff. But now that I'm so much less defensive about Art, I have allowed myself to be influenced by everything, whether I like it or not. Vocabulary is used differently be everyone, and again, no one person uses it in the "right" way. This is not to say I like everything I see - far from it! I do try to give everything the benefit of the doubt at the time, and you can never predict how something might strike you at a different time. For example, I used to hate Folk Art, but now I absolutely love it - indeed so far from being naive.

    What projects do you have lined up for the future? What sorts of developments can we expect to discover in future pieces?

    Presently, I am working on a small number of projects. Foremost is a book with Jarboe, which will contain 23 pieces of her writing, with 23 prints of mine. But with the completion of my degree at U. Penn, time for progress has been miserably and regrettably sparse. But, so far I can say the images will all be in a style similar to that of the Pastoral prints, but with insects. I also am starting in earnest work on my new portfolio for graduate school. The styles and compositions will be familiar, but with treatments likened to the ancient Roman frescos and tiles that have been a recent influence. I have sketches for a series of prints of "Trick Riders", another more statuesque series in large square format similar to huge Roman bath tiles from Pompeii, and another consisting of solitary figures hovering over fighting beasts which will titled "Family Struggles." This coming summer will afford me the luxury of time in which to finish these, and get them out. I look forward to it!